comparisons
Your options, compared honestly
Including the options that aren't us. Every comparison here names the case where the other choice wins — because you'll figure it out anyway, and we'd rather you trust the rest of the page.
comparison
AI agency vs. in-house AI hire
Hiring wins when you have the budget for a genuinely senior person and enough ongoing AI work to keep them busy. Here's how to tell which side of that line you're on.
comparison
AI agents vs. virtual assistants
VAs win on judgment and relationships. Agents win on volume, speed, and 24/7 consistency. Most businesses need a split, not a pick.
comparison
Automating vs. making the next hire
Read the job description before you post it. If it's mostly a list of repeated procedures, you may be describing a workflow rather than a person.
comparison
ChatGPT alone vs. installed AI agents
A chat window makes individuals faster. Installed agents do the work when nobody is at a keyboard. Here is how to tell which one your business actually needs.
comparison
Custom AI agents vs. off-the-shelf AI tools
Off-the-shelf tools win more often than an agency should admit. Here is the honest line between problems you buy a subscription for and workflows worth building.
comparison
DIY AI vs. done-for-you
If the problem costs you less than roughly $30K a year, or you have a capable internal owner, DIY wins. Here's the honest math on both sides of the line.
comparison
RPA vs. AI agents
RPA and AI agents are different machines for different work. Where scripted bots still beat agents outright, and where language and judgment change the answer.
comparison
Zapier/Make vs. custom automation
No-code tools win on speed and cost. Custom wins on reliability and complexity. The honest line between them is sharper than either side admits.